Unity08. A people's movement to take our country back.

It comes down to listening to there ideas.
They are not far right or far left.

Both impress me as logical thinkers who use that skill to take positions and present their views. An experienced politician coupled with a sucessful businessman seems to me to cover most bases and tackle bipartison issues.

I like the independent thinking of both Romney and Lieberman. Romney did great things for his state and Lieberman isn't afraid to take stands for what he believes in regardless of consequences.

I am excited about these candidates because both of them are honest, display leadership qualities, and have fresh ideas.

These people seem to understand the plight of most Americans. They are down to earth, and realize that the people in the "middle" are the driving force of what is America.

A serious vision for Iraq.

I prefer a Democrat for
President and Obama would
work well in a bipartisan
ticket.

Hagel is somebody who is both
open minded and principled,
qualities that I think are
important.

Eliot Spitzer will always do what's right for citizens, as will Ralph Nader.

Both candidates have demonstrated willingness to stand for their beliefs, even if it crossed party priorities. But neither is inflexible or an ideologue. What our nation is needing.

They both put reason ahead of partisan politics.

Barbara Boxer is an intelligent, tough and hard-working woman. She has opinions and expresses them well.

Tim Penney is a low-keyed personality who just quietly goes about doing (and accomplishing) what he thinks is right. He has been elected to office and has also worked in the system as a private citizen.

It is time to return the U.S. to credibility on the World stage. The days of we are right, and you are wrong, we are a superpower, and you are not, must end. The work of the people must resume at home as well.

A Graham - Schumer ticket with an appropriate set of centrist positions would have national credibility and I think it could potentially win.

Among the non-affiliated, I propose Warren Buffet for one of the positions if either of the partisan-affiliated candidates is unavailable.

For Balance, and get along

Although it's Nader who has all the right ideas and is willing to stand up for them, I think Edwards might be more able to get them accomplished. Together they would be very, very good for the country

I like John Edwards because he came from humble beginnings and turned into a great attorney. I beleive he wants to help all Americans, whatever their circumstances.

I like Donald Trump for Vice President because I admire his business skills. I do think we need someone with a good head for business and the diplomatic skills to back up the "idea man."

Both men are proven military leaders who I believe could lead us to a victory in Iraq without extending the need for American troops in the region. Powell possesses proven skills needed to engage in meaningfull dialog with other world leaders, and has their respect as well.

America needs to rebuild it's standing in the eyes of other nations, and I believe this team could do the job.

Both share similar views, and value teamwork.

Both men have undisputed national security experience, a dedication to serving our country, and not just a polical party. They both have rational views of global issues, and our national issues that affect us as we go about our daily lives. They both believe in Duty, Honor, Country.

I went for the best fresh ideas candidates, as opposed to the most likely. My major concern with Unity 08 is the way it could impact a tight race the way that jerk Nader did in 2024. The death for unity 08 would be to see Nader on the ticket ...

Bill Richardson has extremly wide range of experience in National and International related positions. He has also demonstrated an ability to negotiate issues on the International stage.

I've observed Sen.Susan Collins in the news media, but also on C-span observing how she has run the Committees in the Senate that she has chaired. She is intelligent, pragmatic and realistic. She is more concerned about getting the facts and framing her position based on those facts and the reality. Her decis

This combo has the ability to appeal to the broadest segment of the voting public - two classiclly different philosophies, but working together. What we need.

I like the straight talk I am hearing from Mr.Thompson and believe he is exactly the kind of leader we need right now. I think that Mr. Obama has the potential to be a great leaderbut needs to "age" a little.

Best ticket for me would be Thompson for president and Obama for Vice President. Thompson; sober, Intelligent,experienced, gravitas. Obama; hopeful, energetic, future potential.

Giuliani for security, Republican values. Richardson for diplomacy, Democratic values.

It's time to put people in the White House with some depth of knowledge. These people have knowledge, character, and a willingness to put the country ahead of partisanship.

They have shown that they can put country over party.

Okay, so here's the deal. The choices I just made feel like the choices I would make in a forwarded email. It's more fun than anything else, more imaginative than realistic. I think all the hoopla about the 'real choice' for '08 is just for entertainment. But here's what I really LOVE about my choices, they're in a perfect world scenario. We're not there yet, but thank you so much for the liberty to imagine a campaign that ACTUALLY inspired Americans to dream big. Just watched the movie "Bobby"... wish I was alive during that time of inspired leadership.

People of Faith and a sence of character. Also, people who have a presence to be real and hold a positive image in my view.

Everyone knows that Al Gore should be president. He is well-balanced, intelligent, and honest.

I feel both are common sense centrists who have a proven track record establishing their knowledge and political experience needed to get us out of the Iraq debacle and would fight to re-establish our middle class issues!
They have the love of country to stop illegal immigration , seal the borders and withdraw from any initiative to establish any North American Union!
The vast majority of the American voters are in the center of the political spectrum, so we need common sense, knowledgeable pe

They represent change and integrity.

I believe that each of these men is smart, thoughtful and willing to listen to the advise of others. At this time in our history I find listening and actually considering the advise of others is extremely important.

The leader of the ticket should be an independent because no politician is going to be willing to toss off their future money "connection" even if they are no longer in politics. Hagel may be an exception to this as a VP but he is too frmly ultra conservative to lead a ticket. So you need a pragmatist -- Buffet to lead and select his cabinet from the best and the brightest rather then the connected and the buddies

Presidental candidate Richardson has the knowledge and experience. Hagel sounds off against the war

Edwards for the good of the working class and the poor. Friedman for his knowledge of what is going on in the rest of the world. Neither are corporate lap dogs.

Warner bring government and business management to the ticket,while Hagel gives the ticket a balance of military and foreign policy experience. One is from the south and one from the heartland which plays to the middleclass and the rural poor.

In dependent thinking across the board. I feel they would put country first. They can heal the deep divide felt today.

Pelosi rocks and can carry Steve Case.

These people (either of whom I would support for President) are commonly working in a bipartisan way. Both realize the war in iraq is the major problem facing this country and have sought ways to end it.

I also believe each of these candidates will take seriously the issue of global warming and work to at least alleviate the world wide problems taht is will cause. I also think these candidates will also are capable of bringing intelligence, compassion, strength to solving health care, soc

Both represent a desire for fundamental economic change.

Fred Thompson is an 'experienced hand' in Washington as staff attorney and elected Senator, and yet retains the integrity and courage of his convictions. Also, he doesn't need the job as he can make a great living in Hollywood; if he runs, it will be testimony to his patriotism.

Lieberman is one of the Dems who is not drinking the Koolaid on Iraq. He was returned to his Senate seat running as independent when the Connecticut party went with a Koolaid drinker. He may well join in the "party

It is truly a dream to have intelligent, articulate, independent people as candidates in 08, not those who spout the 'party line' or say only what they think the voters want to hear. These two are at least a start!

Most of these candidates represent the center and the even thoughtfulness at which they arrive at their positions.

Michael Bloomberg is, hands-down, the least politically driven of every available candidate in all parties. He is purely about results and gets them. He's trustworthy. Schumer is the most eloquent about the needs and issues of our nation and could be an effective leader by using his ability to articulate what's important and why.

all these people are very smart and capable people for the job

Both of these canidates will end big money's control of "our", using the term loosely government.

This would give us the ability to move things forward while having some experience in the Vice President

Both are strong on defense and understand the need to fight terror in the Middle East plus have been strong advocates of truely reaching across party lines to build collaboration between the parties. They both have voted a moderate agenda rather than their party's far left or far right pholosophy.